The answer is: E
Explanation
The correct option is E: The transfer of share shall not be validated, as E had constructive notice that D needed to offer the shares to the existing members of ABC Private Limited prior to transferring the shares to E.
Explanation:
According to the principle of constructive notice, every outsider who deals with a company is deemed to have notice of the contents of the memorandum of association and the articles of association of such company. These documents are public and binding on the company and its members.
The articles of association of ABC Private Limited clearly provide that its members shall transfer shares to a third party only after first having offered such shares to the other existing members, on a pro rata basis, at the existing market value of such shares. This is a restriction on the transferability of shares and is valid and enforceable.
D violated this restriction by transferring the shares to E without offering them to the other existing members. E, as an outsider, had constructive notice of this restriction and therefore cannot claim ignorance or good faith. E cannot enforce the transfer of shares against ABC Private Limited, as it is ultra vires the articles of association.
The other options are incorrect because they either ignore or contradict the principle of constructive notice or the articles of association. The price, approval, or doctrine of 'caveta venditor' are irrelevant in this case. ABC Private Limited does not need to have notice of the sale of shares, as it is not bound by it.