The answer is: D
Explanation
The correct option is D : No, because when A refused to go with the police officer, the police officer did not touch or otherwise attempt to confine A, so A is not yet under arrest.
This is because, according to the principle, an arrest requires either physical contact or confinement of the person to be arrested, or submission to the custody by word or action. In this case, the police officer has told A that he is under arrest, but A has refused to go with him. The police officer has not touched or confined A's body, nor has A submitted to the custody by word or action. Therefore, A is not under arrest at this stage. The fact that the police officer has said that he will return the next day with more officers does not change the situation, as it is only a future intention and not a present action. Similarly, the fact that A has said that he will go with the officers the next day does not constitute submission, as it is only a conditional promise and not a current compliance.
Therefore, A is free to do as he pleases until he is actually arrested by the police officer.