A:
B can institute a fresh suit in India, provided the English court is a court of competent jurisdiction.
B:
B cannot institute a fresh suit in India, provided the English court is a court of competent jurisdiction.
C:
B can institute a fresh suit only before High Court that has a jurisdiction.
D:
B cannot institute a fresh suit without the consent of the English court.
E:
B can only prefer an appeal before the Supreme Court of India.
Explanation
The most correct option in this situation is:
B: B cannot institute a fresh suit in India, provided the English court is a court of competent jurisdiction.
Explanation:
The principle stated in the question is accurate. A judgment delivered by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction can be enforced by an Indian court, and it will operate as res judicata between the parties. This means that if the English court is a court of competent jurisdiction and has already decided the matter in favor of A based on the principles of natural justice and applicable international commercial laws, B cannot institute a fresh suit on the same matter in India.
Option B accurately reflects this principle. If the English court is competent and has already issued a judgment, B cannot re-litigate the same matter in India. Options A, C, D, and E do not align with this legal principle and would not be correct in this context.