A:
No, it is not necessary to confirm if A is authorized since B is your client; it is only fair to assume that its legal manager would be authorize.
B:
Yes, as a matter of rule, it is necessary that you confirm whether A is authorized to give instructions on behalf of B.
C:
No, it is not necessary. Under law, all legal managers are authorized to represent a private limited company.
D:
Since C had been authorized to give instructions on behalf of B, it is only fair to assume that A also will be authorized.
E:
It does not matter who is authorized to give instructions. All that matters is who is authorized to represent the company in the suit.
Explanation
The correct answer is :
B: Yes, as a matter of rule, it is necessary that you confirm whether A is authorized to give instructions on behalf of B.
Explanation:
While B is your client, and A is one of its legal managers, it is essential to verify whether A is specifically authorized to give instructions regarding the suit for recovery of money against a vendor. Legal authority within a company can vary, and it is crucial to ensure that the person providing instructions has the proper authorization to do so. Just because A is a legal manager of the company does not automatically mean they are authorized to handle every legal matter for the company. Therefore, it is necessary to confirm A's authority in this specific matter.