5.
The answer is: B
Explanation
he correct option is B: There was no arbitration agreement between B and C, and therefore C's suit will be dismissed.
The explanation is as follows:
- The principle states that a court may refer parties to arbitration only in respect of a matter that is the subject matter of an arbitration agreement and only between parties who are parties to the arbitration agreement.
- In this case, the arbitration agreement was between A and B, who entered into a contract to sell A's house to B. C was not a party to the contract or the arbitration agreement. Therefore, C cannot invoke the arbitration clause against B.
- Moreover, the matter that C wants to arbitrate is not the subject matter of the contract or the arbitration agreement. The contract was about the sale of A's house to B, not about B's obligation to pay C. The payment to C was an ancillary matter that was not covered by the arbitration clause.
- Therefore, C's suit will be dismissed as she has no right to seek arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.