The answer is: C
Explanation
The correct option is:
C: Since there is no settlement agreement between A and B yet, D cannot claim his share under C's proposal.
Explanation:
In the scenario presented, C, the conciliator, made a proposal for the settlement of the land dispute between A and B. However, it's important to note that a successful conciliation proceeding comes to an end only when the settlement agreement is signed by the parties involved.
As per the principle provided, the settlement agreement is final and binding on the parties and persons claiming under them respectively. In this case, there is no mention that A and B have signed the settlement agreement proposed by C. Therefore, there is no binding settlement agreement in place yet.
Since there is no settlement agreement between A and B, D cannot claim his share under C's proposal because the proposal alone does not create a binding agreement. D may have concerns about the proposal being biased in favor of B, but unless A and B actually sign and agree to the proposal, it does not become a binding settlement agreement. Therefore, option C is the most accurate in this context.