The answer is: D
Explanation
The most accurate option in light of the provided principle is:
D: This will not constitute a lawful marriage as proposal and acceptance were made at two different meetings.
Explanation:
The principle states that for a Muslim marriage to be valid, both the proposal (ijab) and acceptance (qabul) must occur at the same meeting. In this case:
• A made the proposal ("I have married myself to B") in the presence of D and E at one meeting when B was absent.
• D and E conveyed this information to B.
• B responded with acceptance in the presence of D and E, but this happened at a different meeting.
Because the proposal and acceptance occurred at two separate meetings, this does not satisfy the essential requirement for a lawful Muslim marriage, as stated in the principle. Therefore, option D is the correct one. The presence of D and E or their relationship to A and B is not relevant in this context.